| (GS -III- Environment and Ecology) |
India, being a country with diverse geomorphology and rich biodiversity, faces the challenge of balancing development with environmental conservation. To maintain this balance, the government has developed the concept of Ecologically Sensitive Zones (ESZs). The idea is to allow controlled development without disturbing the ecological balance of protected areas.
"Not to stop development, but to regulate it in an environmentally sustainable manner."
Definition:-
Though the term “ESZ” is not explicitly mentioned in a specific law, its legal foundation is derived from:
|
Provision |
Description |
|
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 |
Section 3(2)(v) empowers the central government to regulate industrial and developmental activities in areas that pose a threat to the environment. |
|
Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 (Rule 5) |
Allows the government to restrict or regulate certain activities in designated areas. |
|
MoEFCC Guidelines (2011) |
Guidelines for ESZ demarcation, activity categorization, and boundary determination. |
|
Supreme Court Orders (2022) |
Directed that a minimum 1 km ESZ should be established around every National Park and Wildlife Sanctuary. |
|
Type |
Description / Examples |
|
Prohibited |
Mining, thermal power plants, large buildings, waste disposal plants, radioactive materials, high-pollution industries. |
|
Regulated |
Agriculture, fisheries, tourism, small-scale industries – only with environmental approval. |
|
Permitted |
Organic farming, afforestation, environmental education, eco-tourism, community-based livelihoods, reforestation. |
Each ESZ has a Zonal Master Plan that specifies permissible activities in different zones.
|
Challenge |
Description |
|
Local opposition & livelihood concerns |
Villagers may be dissatisfied due to restrictions on farming, construction, or tourism. |
|
Administrative coordination |
Delays in decision-making between MoEFCC and state governments. |
|
Weak monitoring & enforcement |
Many zones exist only on paper; monitoring committees may be inactive. |
|
Development vs conservation |
Infrastructure projects (highways, dams, hydro projects) often clash with conservation policies. |
|
Policy ambiguity |
Lack of uniform standards; “site-specific” approach leads to inconsistency. |
|
Area |
Description |
|
Ramgarh Vishdhari Tiger Reserve (Rajasthan) |
ESZ proposed between 1 km to 14.79 km; local farmers raised concerns about land-use restrictions. |
|
Silent Valley National Park (Kerala) |
Eco-tourism and community conservation projects encouraged in the ESZ. |
|
Kaziranga National Park (Assam) |
Supreme Court banned mining; ESZ helped in biodiversity conservation. |
Our support team will be happy to assist you!