The International Monetary Fund (IMF), in its June 2025 report “Growing Retail Digital Payments (Value of Interoperability)”, has recognized India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI) as the world’s largest retail fast payment system.
According to the report, UPI is the largest real-time payment system globally based on transaction volume. Additionally, ACI Worldwide’s “Prime Time for Real-Time 2024” report states that in global real-time payment transactions:
The Government of India, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), and the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) are jointly working to promote digital payments among small merchants and consumers. Key initiatives include:
By FY 2024–25:
The table below shows transaction volumes and global market share of major real-time payment systems worldwide:
|
Country |
Transaction Volume (in billions) |
Global Share (%) |
|
India (UPI) |
129.3 |
49% |
|
Brazil |
37.4 |
14% |
|
Thailand |
20.4 |
8% |
|
China |
17.2 |
6% |
|
South Korea |
9.1 |
3% |
|
Other Countries |
52.8 |
20% |
|
Total |
266.2 |
100% |
Source: ACI Worldwide – Prime Time for Real-Time 2024 Report
UPI (Unified Payments Interface) can now be used in 8 countries. The latest addition is Qatar. The countries where UPI is accepted are:-

UPI is a real-time payment system in India, developed by NPCI. It enables instant bank-to-bank money transfers using a simple UPI ID, mobile number, or QR code through a smartphone. Multiple bank accounts can be linked in a single app, and the service is available 24×7. UPI has transformed digital payments in India by offering a secure, fast, and easy payment method.
| Prelims: (Global Environmental Governance + CA) Mains: (GS 2 – International Institutions; GS 3 – Environment) |
The seventh UN Environment Assembly (UNEA-7) is currently taking place in Nairobi, Kenya, bringing together all UN member states to deliberate on global environmental priorities. The session has opened amid concerns over funding cuts, disagreements on UNEP’s five-year strategy, and widening geopolitical divides—all setting a tense backdrop for UNEA-7.
1. Highest Environmental Decision-Making Body
2. Biennial Sessions
3. Origin at Rio+20 (2012)
1. Sets the Global Environmental Agenda
2. Provides Policy Guidance to UNEP
Aligns UNEP with global goals including:
3. Facilitates Dialogue & Knowledge Sharing
4. Reviews Environmental Policies
5. Builds Global Partnerships
Theme: “Advancing sustainable solutions for a resilient planet.”
These tensions reflect deeper divides in global environmental politics.
FAQs1. What is UNEA ? The UN’s highest decision-making body on global environmental matters. 2. Why is UNEA held in Nairobi ? Because UNEP—UN’s environmental agency—is headquartered there. 3. How often does UNEA meet ? Every two years. 4. What is the theme of UNEA-7 ? “Advancing sustainable solutions for a resilient planet.” 5. Why is UNEA-7 important this year ? It comes amid funding cuts and geopolitical disagreements that could affect global environmental action. |
| Prelims: (Polity + CA) Mains: (GS 2 – Governance; GS 1 – Society) |
Karnataka has introduced the Karnataka Hate Speech and Hate Crimes (Prevention) Bill, 2025, proposing 1–10 years’ imprisonment, enhanced fines, and collective liability for organisations involved in hate speech or hate-related offences.
The state government argues that India lacks a clear statutory definition of hate speech, despite its frequent use in public debate — creating gaps in enforcement and leaving police dependent on scattered provisions.
For decades, India has struggled with hate speech regulation because:
Many democracies, including the U.K., Canada, and Germany, have enacted explicit hate speech statutes. India, meanwhile, continues to use general public-order provisions, leaving much ambiguity. Karnataka is now the first Indian state to attempt filling this legal vacuum.
India has no standalone hate speech law. Police rely on various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS):
Section 196 BNS (Former IPC 153A)
Penalises:
Conviction rate is low — only 20.2% in 2020 (NCRB).
Section 299 BNS (Former IPC 295A)
Punishes:
Often invoked in cases involving desecration, insults to religious groups, or provocative speech.
Section 353 BNS
Penalises:
These are cognisable offences with penalties up to three years.
2022 — Court Flags “Climate of Hate”
SC directed Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, and Uttarakhand to act suo motu against hate speech.
2023 — Directive Extended Nationwide
Police across India were told to take action even without complaints.
2023 — Court Admits Definitional Complexity
Justices observed that defining hate speech is inherently difficult and that the real problem is enforcement failure, not the absence of law.
2025 — Court Steps Back
In November 2025, a bench clarified the SC cannot supervise every incident, saying police and High Courts are capable of handling such cases and must follow the Tehseen Poonawalla protocol.
Karnataka becomes the first state to propose a law specifically addressing hate speech and hate crimes.
Hate speech is defined as expressions causing:
Notably, gender & sexual orientation are included — expanding beyond BNS protections.
1. Collective Liability for Organisations
If hate speech is committed through an organisation:
2. Regulation of Online Content
The state can:
This gives Karnataka explicit regulatory power over digital hate content — something not directly provided under national law.
3. Penalties
Offences are:
4. Victim Compensation
Mandatory compensation must be provided to victims of hate speech or hate crimes.
5. Public Good Exemption
Books, artworks, academic work, and publications will be exempt if proven to serve public interest.
FAQs1. Why does Karnataka need a separate hate speech law ? Because India lacks a clear statutory definition of hate speech, causing inconsistent enforcement and legal ambiguity. 2. Does the Bill apply to online platforms ? Yes. It empowers the state government to block or remove hate content posted online. 3. What is “collective liability” ? If hate speech is committed via an organisation, responsible office bearers can also be held guilty. 4. How severe are the penalties ? Up to 10 years’ imprisonment for repeat offences, with significant fines. 5. Does the Bill restrict freedom of speech ? The Bill includes a public good exemption, but concerns about overreach may arise during implementation. |
| Prelims: (Geography + CA) Mains: (GS 3 – Environment) |
The outcomes of COP30 in Belém, Brazil, have underscored a stark reality, the 1.5°C global warming threshold has effectively been breached, and the world is running out of time to avert deepening climate crises. Amid this urgency, experts are calling for stronger South-led regional climate multilateralism, with South Asia emerging as a critical geography for coordinated climate action.
South Asia is one of the most climate-vulnerable regions in the world, with rising temperatures, recurrent floods, accelerated glacial melt in the Himalayas, sea-level rise, and extreme heat waves threatening lives and economies. At COP30, negotiators highlighted that the Paris Agreement’s voluntary and nationally driven approach has not delivered adequate ambition, especially for developing countries bearing disproportionate climate risks.
With geopolitical rivalries blocking progress through traditional platforms like SAARC, experts argue that climate action could become a fresh pathway for rebuilding regional cooperation, similar to how crises in the past (tsunamis, earthquakes, water shortages) triggered collaborative responses. In this context, a proposal is gaining traction for a South Asian Climate Cooperation Council (SACCC), a new regional climate institution tailored to the region’s ecological and developmental needs.
A new institutional mechanism is being proposed to coordinate mutually reinforcing climate action in South Asia.
It draws lessons from past examples of regional cooperation:
This framework emphasizes that while SAARC has struggled, functional cooperation—especially around climate risks—remains both possible and necessary.
Regional energy collaboration already offers a working template:
A network of climate research and innovation centres, leveraging country strengths:
Focus areas include:
A dedicated financial mechanism to:
In collaboration with ADB, World Bank, GCF, the facility could:
A regional, independent climate-science body that would:
FAQs1. What is the core idea behind the South Asian Climate Cooperation Council (SACCC) ? It aims to create a regional institutional framework for joint climate mitigation, adaptation, finance, and research across South Asian countries. 2. Why is regional climate action important for South Asia ? Because ecosystems like the Himalayas, monsoons, rivers, and coasts are interconnected, making climate impacts and solutions inherently cross-border. 3. What existing cooperation supports this proposal ? The SAARC energy agreement and successful cross-border electricity trade show that functional regionalism is achievable. 4. How would the proposed climate finance facility help ? By pooling funds, issuing green bonds, and strengthening access to global climate finance, especially for climate-vulnerable nations. 5. Is SACCC meant to replace SAARC ? No. It is meant to function as a focused climate cooperation platform, independent of SAARC’s broader political constraints. |
| Prelims: (Economy + CA) Mains: (GS 3 – Economy) |
India’s persistent current account deficit (CAD) remains a structural challenge, yet the recent sharp weakening of the rupee is being driven not by the CAD but by severe stress in capital inflows. This shift highlights that India’s external vulnerability now lies in the capital account rather than the current account.
1. Two Components of the Current Account
2. Merchandise Trade Deficit Keeps Widening
3. Invisibles Surplus: India’s Cushion
Drivers of large surpluses:
Payments offset by this surplus include:
Surplus growth:
4. Why CAD Remains Manageable
The invisibles surplus cushions the merchandise deficit, keeping the CAD from exploding despite weak goods exports.
5. India as the “Office of the World”
1. CAD Has Actually Reduced
2. Rupee Depreciation Across Currencies
This drop is linked to weakening capital inflows, not import-heavy trade.
1. Capital Inflows at Multi-Year Lows
Earlier: capital inflows comfortably exceeded CAD and boosted forex reserves.
Now:
This imbalance directly weakens the rupee.
India has maintained 8.2% average GDP growth since 2021–22 and 8% growth in the first half of 2025–26. Ordinarily, such growth attracts foreign capital — yet investors have been exiting, creating a capital account deficit.
FAQs1. If CAD has improved, why is the rupee still falling ? Because foreign capital inflows have sharply declined, reducing dollar supply and weakening the rupee. 2. What allows India to sustain a large merchandise deficit ? A rapidly growing invisibles surplus from IT services, remittances, and skilled professional exports. 3. Why are foreign investments falling despite strong GDP growth ? Global financial tightening, investor risk aversion, and reduced appetite for emerging markets. 4. Does a widening merchandise deficit threaten stability ? Not immediately—because invisibles substantially offset it. 5. What is India’s biggest external risk today ? A capital account deficit caused by low FDI/FPI inflows, not the CAD. |
| (Prelims: Current Events of National and International Importance) (Mains, General Studies Paper 3: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways, etc.) |
Recently, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) granted IndiGo Airlines a one-time temporary exemption from certain Flight Duty Time Limit (FDTL) norms for pilots.

Meta is in ongoing discussions with Google to use its Tensor Processing Units (TPUs).

While CPUs are great for general tasks and GPUs are an excellent choice for gaming and AI, TPUs are specifically designed to make AI models work faster and more efficiently.
| Prelims: (Security + CA) Mains: (GS 2 – Governance; GS 3 – Infrastructure) |
IndiGo’s large-scale flight cancellations and the government’s subsequent suspension of the DGCA’s newly notified Flight Duty Time Limitation (FDTL) norms have raised serious concerns about India’s aviation safety framework.
Despite the rules being mandated under a High Court order to address crew fatigue, the Ministry placed them under abeyance, prioritising operational continuity over safety considerations. Critics argue that the response reflects a deeper erosion of regulatory integrity, with commercial interests being placed above passenger and crew safety.
India’s aviation sector has experienced repeated tensions between safety norms and airline operational demands. Attempts to strengthen pilot rest regulations have been diluted several times due to industry pushback. The recent IndiGo disruptions have exposed structural weaknesses: chronic under-staffing, inconsistent enforcement of Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR), and regulatory decisions that appear reactive rather than safety-driven.
Pilot unions challenged the 2008 dilution in the Bombay High Court. The Court initially criticised DGCA and the Ministry for:
It even advised airlines to reduce flights instead of overworking pilots. However, in an unexpected reversal, the same Court later upheld the Ministry’s decision, weakening the push for stricter fatigue norms.
DGCA’s own CAR (Series C, Part II, Section 3, April 2022) mandates:
However, enforcement has been weak. Airlines, especially IndiGo, operate with lean crew levels, making them extremely vulnerable to any regulatory change.
Even earlier requirements were stricter:
Yet airlines appeared to deliberately understaff, taking advantage of lax oversight.
In 2006, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) advised India to establish an independent aviation regulator, free from government control. Eighteen years later, the warning seems validated: oversight has weakened, and airlines operate with considerable confidence that violations will attract minimal consequences.
Two contradictory actions within hours revealed regulatory breakdown:
This amounted to state-sanctioned dilution of safety norms. Moreover, IndiGo—non-compliant for over a year—has now been granted time until February 10, 2026, a deadline critics expect will be extended again.
Despite three major air disasters since 2010 (Mangaluru, Kozhikode, Ahmedabad), regulatory reform has remained slow. The Air India AI 171 crash report is still pending without explanation.
IndiGo claims operations will stabilise in 10–15 days, but safety concerns remain acute. The decisions taken on December 5, 2025, especially suspending FDTL norms, suggest that in India’s aviation sector, “safety first” remains more rhetoric than reality.
FAQs1. What triggered the suspension of FDTL rules ? IndiGo’s large-scale cancellations and operational instability prompted the Ministry to temporarily halt the new norms. 2. Why are FDTL norms important ? They regulate pilot duty hours and rest periods to prevent fatigue, a major factor in aviation safety. 3. What is the main structural issue behind the crisis ? Chronic understaffing—airlines often operate with fewer pilot sets than mandated, leaving no buffer for disruptions. 4. Why is ICAO’s warning relevant today ? It highlighted the need for an independent regulator. The present crisis shows how regulatory decisions may be influenced by commercial pressures. 5. Are passengers adequately compensated ? Refunds cover tickets, but secondary losses—hotels, transport, meetings—are usually uncompensated. |
Our support team will be happy to assist you!