New
Hindi Medium: (Delhi) - GS Foundation (P+M) : 14th Oct. 2026, 06:00 PM Hindi Medium: (Prayagraj) - GS Foundation (P+M) : 23rd Oct. 2026, 11:00 AM English Medium: (Delhi) - GS Foundation (P+M) : 12th Oct. 2026, 5:30PM English Medium: (Prayagraj) - GS Foundation (P+M) : 19th Aug 2026, 11:00 AM Hindi Medium: (Delhi) - GS Foundation (P+M) : 14th Oct. 2026, 06:00 PM Hindi Medium: (Prayagraj) - GS Foundation (P+M) : 23rd Oct. 2026, 11:00 AM English Medium: (Delhi) - GS Foundation (P+M) : 12th Oct. 2026, 5:30PM English Medium: (Prayagraj) - GS Foundation (P+M) : 19th Aug 2026, 11:00 AM

Current Affairs for 24 September 2026

Mizoram Woman Farmer Honoured with FAO 100 Women Heroes Award

Prelims: FAO, Lawngtlai District, Horticulture, Agrifood Systems, International Year of the Woman Farmer 2026, World Food Forum, FAO Headquarters, Women Farmers, Rural Development, Agricultural Diversification
MAINS: GS-III (Agriculture) and GS-I (Society)
Keyword: Mizoram Woman Farmer, FAO 100 Women Heroes, International Year of the Woman Farmer 2026, Strawberry Cultivation, Women in Agriculture, Agrifood Systems, Horticulture, Rural Development, Agricultural Diversification, Women Farmers

Why in News?

Z T Lalrithangi, popularly known as Pi Mari-i, a former teacher-turned-farmer from Mizoram, has been selected among the FAO 100 Women Heroes in Agrifood Systems and Rural Development.

Important Points 

  • She is one of two women from India selected among 100 women from more than 600 nominees across 131 countries. The recognition is part of the International Year of the Woman Farmer 2026.
  • Lalrithangi belongs to Sangau in Lawngtlai district, southern Mizoram, and has gained recognition for developing strawberry cultivation as a profitable rural livelihood.

Who is Lalrithangi?

  • Lalrithangi is a postgraduate in Sociology from the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU). She previously worked as a teacher in a private school.
  • After completing her studies, she appeared for several competitive examinations while seeking a government job. She eventually chose farming as her profession and took up strawberry cultivation.
  • Her journey highlights how horticulture and innovative farming can create alternative livelihood opportunities in rural areas.

How Strawberry Farming Changed Her Life

  • Lalrithangi started strawberry cultivation in 2024 after learning about successful strawberry farmers in neighbouring Siaha district.
  • Initially, she cultivated around 1,000 strawberry plants on her land, located about 5 km from Sangau. The initial cultivation generated a profit of around ₹1.5 lakh per year, encouraging her to expand production.
  • Today, she cultivates more than 10,000 strawberry plants along with fruits such as avocado and banana on about two hectares of land.
  • In 2025, she earned more than ₹10 lakh from strawberry cultivation. She also produces strawberry wine from her farm produce.

From Teacher to Farmer

  • Lalrithangi had no formal training in strawberry cultivation when she started farming. She developed her knowledge through online farming videos and interactions with other farmers.
  • Initially, she approached the government for support because strawberry cultivation was not part of the concerned departmental project at that time. She later continued her farming activities while receiving government assistance in different forms.
  • Her experience shows how access to information, local knowledge and government support can help rural farmers adopt high-value horticultural crops.

Family Support and Farming Innovations

  • Lalrithangi has three children and manages farming along with her family responsibilities. She has said that she often learned new farming techniques at night after completing her household work.
  • Her husband, who works at a government primary school, and her in-laws have supported her farming activities.
  • The family visits the farm during weekends, while additional labourers are hired when required.
  • Her success demonstrates the potential of high-value horticulture to improve rural incomes and diversify agricultural livelihoods.

FAO 100 Women Heroes

  • The FAO 100 Women Heroes initiative highlights the individual stories and contributions of women working in agrifood systems and rural development.
  • The initiative is connected with the International Year of the Woman Farmer 2026 (IYWF 2026).
  • FAO has highlighted several challenges faced by women farmers, including limited access to:
    • Land
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Education and training
    • Agricultural services
    • Decision-making opportunities
  • Recognizing women farmers aims to improve awareness of their contribution and support greater gender equality in agrifood systems.

International Year of the Woman Farmer 2026

  • The United Nations has designated 2026 as the International Year of the Woman Farmer to recognize and promote the contribution of women farmers to food systems, agriculture and rural development.
  • The year focuses attention on the important role played by women in agricultural production and the challenges that limit their access to resources and opportunities.

Award Ceremony in Rome

  • The award ceremony is scheduled to be held from 12 to 16 October 2026 during the World Food Forum at FAO headquarters in Rome.
  • According to the report, Lalrithangi was informed about her selection by FAO through email on 21 September 2026.
  • Before this international recognition, she was also selected as the Best Farmer of Lawngtlai district at the Mizoram Horti Fair 2026.

Prelims Practice Question 

With reference to Z T Lalrithangi, recently in the news, consider the following statements:

  1. She belongs to Mizoram.
  2. She has been selected among the FAO 100 Women Heroes.
  3. Her recognition is associated with strawberry cultivation.
  4. She is among the women selected under the International Year of the Woman Farmer 2026.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

A. 1 and 2 only
B. 1, 2 and 3 only
C. 1, 3 and 4 only
D. 1, 2, 3 and 4

Mains Practice Question

Q. Women play a crucial role in India’s agrifood systems and rural economy. Discuss the major challenges faced by women farmers and suggest measures to strengthen their participation in agriculture and rural development.

FAQs

1. Who is Z T Lalrithangi?

Z T Lalrithangi, popularly known as Pi Mari-i, is a former teacher and farmer from Sangau in Mizoram's Lawngtlai district. She has gained recognition for her work in strawberry cultivation.

2. What is the FAO 100 Women Heroes initiative?

It recognizes women making significant contributions to agrifood systems and rural development.

3. Why is Lalrithangi in the news?

She has been selected among the FAO 100 Women Heroes for her contribution to agriculture and rural development through strawberry cultivation.

4. What is the International Year of the Woman Farmer?

The United Nations has designated 2026 as the International Year of the Woman Farmer to highlight the contribution of women to agrifood systems and address the challenges they face.

5. Where will the award ceremony be held?

The recognition will be presented during the World Food Forum at FAO Headquarters in Rome, scheduled for 12–16 October 2026.

8 Years of Ayushman Bharat PM-JAY: Key Facts, Major Achievements, features, Eligibility, Ayushman Vay Vandan, Significance and Challenges

Prelims: Ayushman Bharat, PM-JAY, National Health Authority (NHA), Ayushman Vay Vandana Card, Ayushman Arogya Mandirs, ABHA, Universal Health Coverage and National Health Policy 2017.
Mains: GS Paper II: Government Policies and Interventions, Health Sector, Social Justice, Welfare Schemes for Vulnerable Sections and Public Health Infrastructure.

Why in News?

Ayushman Bharat-Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB PM-JAY) completed eight years since its launch in 2018.

Key Facts

Particular

Details

Full name

Ayushman Bharat-Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana

Launch date 

23 September 2018

Launch location

Ranchi, Jharkhand

Launched by

Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Nodal ministry

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

Implementing authority

National Health Authority (NHA)

Annual health cover

₹5 lakh per eligible family

Target population

Economically vulnerable families, originally covering the bottom 40% of the population

Family coverage

More than 12 crore families

Type of treatment

Secondary and tertiary hospitalisation

Nature of scheme

Government-funded health assurance

Major objective

Financial protection and progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC)

Major Achievements of Ayushman Bharat

The government's anniversary data provides a picture of the scheme's expansion in beneficiary identification, hospital admissions, treatment expenditure and healthcare access.

  • 48.51 Cr+ Ayushman cards as of 21 September 2026
  • 13.25 Cr Hospital admissions as of 31 August 2026
  • ₹2.03 L Cr Treatment authorised as of 31 August 2026
  • 38,000+ Empanelled hospitals as of 31 August 2026

What is Ayushman Bharat?

  • Government of India initiative aimed at improving access to affordable healthcare and reducing the financial burden of medical treatment.
  • It was introduced in the context of the National Health Policy, 2017, which emphasised universal access to quality healthcare.
  • Four major components of the healthcare framework: 
    • AB PM-JAY: Provides eligible beneficiaries with cashless secondary and tertiary hospitalisation coverage of up to ₹5 lakh per family annually.
    • Ayushman Arogya Mandirs (AAMs): Deliver comprehensive primary healthcare, including preventive services, screening, essential medicines and diagnostics.
    • Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM): Supports a digital health ecosystem through health accounts, interoperable records and digital healthcare services.
    • PM-Ayushman Bharat Health Infrastructure Mission (PM-ABHIM): Strengthens public health infrastructure, disease surveillance, laboratories and preparedness for health emergencies.

Major Features of AB PM-JAY

Feature

Explanation

Cashless treatment

Eligible beneficiaries can receive covered treatment without paying the approved package amount upfront.

Family floater

The ₹5 lakh annual limit is shared among eligible members of a family.

No family-size restriction

No cap on family size, age or gender for eligible families under the general scheme.

Pre-existing diseases

Covered from the first day of enrolment.

Nationwide portability

Eligible beneficiaries can access treatment at empanelled hospitals across India.

Public and private hospitals

Both categories can participate through empanelment.

Covered expenses

Includes specified hospitalisation expenses, medicines, diagnostics and applicable pre- and post-hospitalisation care.

Who is Eligible for Ayushman Bharat?

  • The original PM-JAY framework identified economically vulnerable households using deprivation and occupational criteria from the Socio-Economic Caste Census (SECC), 2011.
  • Eligibility has subsequently expanded through additional beneficiary categories and state-level arrangements.
  • 2018 (Original launch): The scheme initially targeted approximately 10.74 crore vulnerable families.
  • March 2024 (Frontline workers): Approximately 37 lakh families of ASHA workers, Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers were included.
  • October 2024 (Senior citizens): Coverage was extended to approximately 6 crore senior citizens aged 70 years and above.

Ayushman Vay Vandana

  • One of the major developments in PM-JAY has been the expansion of healthcare coverage to all citizens aged 70 years and above. 
  • Key provisions include:
    • Eligibility is independent of income or socio-economic status.
    • Senior citizens in families not previously covered under PM-JAY receive an annual family-floater cover of up to ₹5 lakh.
    • Those already belonging to PM-JAY families receive an additional ₹5 lakh annual cover exclusively for eligible senior citizens.
    • Eligible individuals can obtain an Ayushman Vay Vandana Card.

Nationwide Portability of PM-JAY

  • Portability enables an eligible beneficiary to receive treatment at an empanelled hospital outside their home state.
  • This feature is particularly relevant for migrant workers, informal-sector workers and families who travel to other states for specialised treatment.
  • As of 30 June 2026:
    • 29.05 lakh inter-state hospital admissions had been authorised.
    • The corresponding treatment value exceeded ₹8,383.97 crore.
    • Pradhan Mantri Arogya Mitras supported beneficiaries through verification, admission and hospital assistance.

National Health Authority: Role and Functions

  • The National Health Authority (NHA) is responsible for implementing AB PM-JAY at the national level and plays a central role in India's digital health ecosystem.
  • Its major functions include:
    • Developing operational guidelines and health benefit packages.
    • Supporting beneficiary identification and verification.
    • Coordinating with State Health Agencies.
    • Supporting hospital empanelment, claims management and fraud prevention.
    • Implementing the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission.

Ayushman Arogya Mandirs

  • Ayushman Arogya Mandirs complement PM-JAY by bringing primary healthcare services closer to communities.
  • While PM-JAY primarily finances hospitalisation, AAMs focus on preventive, promotive and basic curative healthcare.
  • They support services such as maternal and child healthcare, non-communicable disease screening, essential medicines and diagnostics.
  • According to the government's August 2026 update, more than 1.86 lakh AAMs were functional across India, with cumulative footfall exceeding 540 crore visits. 

Significance of Ayushman Bharat

  • Financial protection: Publicly financed hospitalisation coverage can reduce the risk of catastrophic medical expenditure for eligible households.
  • Healthcare accessibility: Empanelment of public and private hospitals expands the range of facilities available to beneficiaries.
  • Social inclusion: Coverage of economically vulnerable households, frontline workers and senior citizens extends financial protection to different population groups.
  • Cooperative federalism: The scheme requires coordination between the Union government, State Health Agencies and healthcare providers.
  • Digital transformation: ABDM supports interoperable digital health records and healthcare service delivery.

Challenges 

Challenge

Explanation

Unequal hospital distribution

Availability of empanelled hospitals and specialist services varies across regions.

Awareness gaps

Some eligible households may lack information about benefits or enrolment.

Fraud and misuse

Inappropriate claims and irregular billing require effective monitoring.

Treatment exclusions

Certain outpatient and non-hospitalisation expenses remain outside standard PM-JAY coverage.

Claims and payment management

Timely settlement is important for continued provider participation.

Quality of care

Empanelment must be accompanied by effective clinical quality monitoring.

Digital accessibility

Limited digital literacy and connectivity can affect access to digital services.

 

Prelims MCQ

Q. With reference to Ayushman Bharat PM-JAY, consider the following statements:

  1. It provides annual health coverage of ₹5 lakh per eligible family.
  2. It covers secondary and tertiary hospitalisation.
  3. All citizens aged 70 years and above are eligible for coverage irrespective of income.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only

(b) 2 and 3 only

(c) 1 and 3 only

(d) 1, 2 and 3

Mains Practice Question

Q. Discuss the role of Ayushman Bharat in advancing Universal Health Coverage in India. 

FAQs

When was Ayushman Bharat PM-JAY launched?

It was launched on 23 September 2018.

How much health coverage does PM-JAY provide?

Up to ₹5 lakh per eligible family per year.

Which authority implements PM-JAY nationally?

The National Health Authority (NHA).

How many Ayushman cards had been created by September 2026?

Over 48.51 crore, as of 21 September 2026.

Who is eligible for Ayushman Vay Vandana?

All Indian citizens aged 70 years and above, irrespective of income.

U.K. Launches Space Effects Squadron: Key Features, Significance and Challenges

Prelims: No. III Space Effects Squadron, electronic warfare, anti-satellite weapons, Outer Space Treaty, Mission Shakti and NETRA.
Mains: GS Paper II—International security and global governance; GS Paper III—Space technology and security challenges.
Keywords: Counterspace capability, Electronic warfare, Jamming, Space situational awareness, ASAT, Satellite resilience

Why in News?

  • The United Kingdom announced the launch of No. III Space Effects Squadron, a Royal Air Force unit intended to counter hostile activity threatening British interests in space.
  • The squadron will help protect satellites supporting communications, navigation and missile warning. Its establishment highlights the increasing importance of satellite security for both national defence and civilian infrastructure.

Background

  • Satellites provide essential services ranging from telecommunications and weather monitoring to military surveillance and navigation. Their disruption can affect activities on Earth even when no physical attack occurs on terrestrial infrastructure.
  • According to the supplied news report, Britain established two space squadrons in 2023 to monitor threats and provide warnings. The new unit adds an operational response capability to this existing structure.
  • The development reflects a broader security challenge: countries increasingly depend on space systems while also developing technologies capable of disrupting them.

Key Features of the Squadron

  • Organisation: The unit forms part of the Royal Air Force and brings together specialist personnel from across the armed forces.
  • Primary objective: It will counter hostile interference with satellites and safeguard British access to space services.
  • Technology: Its publicly announced tools include electronic warfare.
  • Operational role: It will support offensive and defensive space operations.
  • Future development: Its capabilities are expected to expand as additional systems enter service.

The announcement does not provide a complete inventory of its equipment. The creation of the squadron should therefore not be interpreted as confirmation that Britain has deployed a particular weapon in orbit.

How Does It Differ from Existing Space Squadrons?

Unit

Broad function

No. I Space Operations Squadron

Space operations and monitoring

No. II Space Warning Squadron

Warning of threats

No. III Space Effects Squadron

Acting against hostile activity

The distinction is between identifying a threat and possessing the means to respond to it. The new squadron adds the latter function to Britain’s space security structure.

Understanding Threats to Satellites

  • Electronic interference: Jamming can prevent receivers from obtaining usable signals. Spoofing involves transmitting deceptive signals that may mislead a system about location or timing.
  • Cyberattacks: Attacks on ground stations, control networks or connected software can threaten satellite operations and the information they carry.
  • Physical attacks: Anti-satellite weapons can damage or destroy spacecraft. Destructive attacks may also create debris that threatens unrelated satellites.
  • Orbital interference: Suspicious close approaches can create uncertainty about whether another spacecraft is inspecting, servicing or threatening a satellite.

These are general categories of space threats, not a confirmed list of the new squadron’s capabilities.

Significance

  • Protection of essential services: Satellite security supports the continuity of services used by governments, businesses and the public.
  • Military preparedness: Reliable satellite links are important for coordinated operations, intelligence and early warning. Disruption could weaken decision-making during a crisis.
  • Deterrence: A credible ability to detect and respond to interference may discourage hostile actions. However, its effectiveness depends on clear communication and avoiding miscalculation.
  • Changing nature of security: The development illustrates how conflict can extend beyond land, sea and air to the digital and space systems supporting them.

International Legal Framework

  • The Outer Space Treaty, 1967, provides a foundation for international space law. Article IV prohibits placing nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in Earth orbit, installing them on celestial bodies, or stationing them elsewhere in outer space.
  • It also reserves the Moon and other celestial bodies for peaceful purposes and prohibits military bases, weapons testing and military manoeuvres there.
  • However, the treaty does not establish a blanket prohibition on all conventional weapons in Earth orbit or all military uses of satellites. Military communications and reconnaissance should not automatically be equated with prohibited activity.
  • Space is therefore not a legal vacuum. The difficulty lies in addressing modern counterspace threats through sufficiently clear rules, verification and enforcement.

Relevance for India

  • Safeguarding space infrastructure: India’s civilian and defence activities depend on satellite services. Protecting spacecraft, ground facilities and communication links is therefore strategically important.
  • Mission Shakti: India conducted its anti-satellite missile test on March 27, 2019. It demonstrated a counterspace capability and made satellite security an important subject for Indian strategic debate.
  • Space situational awareness: ISRO’s NETRA project includes tracking and analysis infrastructure intended to improve awareness of objects in space. Such monitoring supports the protection and sustainable operation of space assets.
  • Policy implications: India can strengthen resilience through secure communication links, backup arrangements, better monitoring and cooperation between civilian and defence institutions. These are policy priorities suggested by the development, rather than announced components of the British initiative.

Challenges

  • Escalation risks: Measures presented as defensive may be interpreted by another country as preparation for offensive action.
  • Attribution difficulties: Distinguishing deliberate interference from technical failures or environmental effects can complicate responses.
  • Civilian consequences: Disrupting systems serving both military and civilian users may affect essential services.
  • Space debris: Destructive attacks can create hazards extending beyond the original target.
  • Governance gaps: Agreement remains difficult on definitions, verification and rules covering modern counterspace capabilities.
  • Cost and complexity: Protecting satellites requires attention to spacecraft, ground infrastructure, software and communication networks.

Way Forward

  • Strengthen resilience: Build redundancy into satellite networks and maintain alternative communication and navigation arrangements.
  • Improve monitoring: Invest in tracking, threat assessment and mechanisms for sharing reliable information.
  • Protect ground infrastructure: Cybersecurity and access controls should cover the full satellite system, including control centres.
  • Reduce escalation: Develop crisis communication channels and clarify responsible behaviour around other countries’ spacecraft.
  • Advance international cooperation: Support practical measures against harmful interference and debris-generating activities while strengthening dialogue on space security.

Conclusion

The British squadron highlights the growing need to protect satellite services against deliberate interference. For India, the central lesson is to strengthen space security while supporting measures that reduce debris, prevent escalation and preserve reliable access to space.

Prelims MCQs

Q. With reference to the Outer Space Treaty, consider the following statements:

  1. It prohibits placing nuclear weapons in Earth orbit.
  2. It prohibits all military communication satellites.
  3. It reserves the Moon and other celestial bodies for peaceful purposes.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 and 3 only
(c) 1 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3

Mains Practice Question

“Growing dependence on satellites has made space security inseparable from national security.” Discuss the challenges posed by counterspace capabilities and suggest measures India should adopt to safeguard its space assets.

FAQs

1. What is No. III Space Effects Squadron?

It is a new British RAF unit tasked with countering hostile activity threatening British interests in space.

2. Why do satellites need military protection?

Their disruption can affect defence operations and civilian services, including communications and navigation.

3. What is electronic warfare in the space context?

It involves electromagnetic capabilities that can disrupt hostile activity or protect satellite-related communications and signals.

4. Does the Outer Space Treaty ban every weapon in space?

No. It prohibits nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction in orbit and elsewhere in space, with additional restrictions applying to celestial bodies.

5. Why is this development relevant to India?

It highlights the need to protect India’s satellite services through monitoring, resilience, secure infrastructure and international cooperation.

SAT-SAAW Deal: India Signs ₹811 Crore Contract with BDL for IAF

Prelims: SAT-SAAW, DRDO, Bharat Dynamics Limited, glide bombs and stand-off weapons.
Mains (GS Paper III): Defence indigenisation, technological self-reliance and military modernisation.
Keywords: SAT-SAAW, Glide bomb, Stand-off capability, Precision guidance, Indigenisation

Why in News?

  • The Ministry of Defence signed a ₹810.79 crore contract with Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) for 160 Satellite Smart Anti Airfield Weapons (SAT-SAAW) and associated equipment for the Indian Air Force.
  • The agreement falls under the Buy (Indian–Indigenously Designed, Developed and Manufactured), or Buy (Indian-IDDM), category.

Background

  • Airfields support aircraft operations and military logistics. Disrupting their functioning can affect an adversary’s ability to sustain air operations.
  • Stand-off weapons allow an aircraft to release a weapon at a distance from its target. Such capability can reduce the need to approach heavily defended locations, although it does not eliminate operational risk.
  • India’s SAAW programme represents an effort to develop precision air-to-surface weapons domestically. BDL describes SAAW as a long-range weapon capable of engaging ground targets after release from fighter aircraft.

Key Points of the Agreement

  • Developer: Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).
  • Supplier: Bharat Dynamics Limited.
  • Weapon type: Air-to-ground precision-guided glide bomb.
  • Platforms named: Jaguar, Hawk and Su-30 MKI.
  • Indigenous content: 60%, with further subsystem indigenisation envisaged.
  • Delivery schedule: Between 2027–28 and 2028–29.
  • Operational role: Neutralising enemy airfields from a long stand-off range.

Technical Context: SAAW

  • BDL’s general SAAW product page lists a weight of 125 kg, a length of 1.85 metres and a range of approximately 90–100 km, depending on release conditions.
  • These are general product specifications. The September 2026 contract announcement does not state the precise range of the SAT-SAAW configuration being procured.

Significance

Strengthening Precision-Strike Capability

The acquisition is intended to improve the IAF’s ability to engage airfield targets from a distance. Its practical value will depend on effective aircraft integration, mission preparation and operational availability.

Supporting Domestic Defence Production

The contract links indigenous research with manufacturing and military procurement. Such orders can help sustain specialised production facilities and encourage suppliers to invest in quality and capacity.

Improving Long-Term Preparedness

Reliable access to domestically produced weapons can support inventory planning and replenishment. This makes production capacity and delivery consistency strategically important alongside weapon performance.

Relevance for India

For India, the broader policy issue is how to turn indigenous designs into dependable military capability at scale. Procurement alone is only one stage; testing, production, training and maintenance also determine operational outcomes.

The agreement provides a useful example for examining the relationship between defence modernisation and industrial policy. Greater domestic capability can give India more control over future upgrades and supply arrangements.

Challenges

The following are broader implementation considerations, rather than reported shortcomings of this contract.

  • Timely production: Manufacturers must meet delivery commitments while maintaining consistent quality.
  • Supply-chain dependence: Domestic assembly should be accompanied by deeper capability in critical components.
  • System integration: Aircraft compatibility, support equipment and personnel training require coordinated planning.
  • Technology resilience: Precision weapons need continued evaluation as electronic warfare and defensive systems evolve.
  • Lifecycle support: Storage, inspection and maintenance arrangements are essential for long-term readiness.

Way Forward

  • India should combine timely procurement with realistic testing, strong quality assurance and predictable production planning. Regular coordination among the armed forces, developers and manufacturers can help identify integration and support requirements early.
  • Indigenisation should focus on critical technologies and reliable domestic suppliers. Continued research, user feedback and lifecycle planning can ensure that production growth translates into sustained operational capability.

Conclusion

The SAT-SAAW agreement connects India’s precision-strike requirements with domestic defence manufacturing. Its lasting value will depend on timely delivery, dependable integration and continued progress in critical technologies.

Prelims MCQs

1. SAT-SAAW is primarily a:

A. Surface-to-air interceptor
B. Air-to-ground precision-guided glide bomb
C. Submarine-launched ballistic missile
D. Anti-submarine torpedo

2. Consider the following statements about the September 2026 SAT-SAAW agreement:

  1. DRDO developed the weapon.
  2. BDL is the contracted supplier.
  3. The procurement is for the Indian Navy.

Which statements are correct?

A. 1 and 2 only
B. 2 and 3 only
C. 1 and 3 only
D. 1, 2 and 3

Mains Practice Question

“Defence self-reliance requires more than indigenous design; it demands reliable production and sustained operational support.” Discuss with reference to India’s precision-weapon programmes. (150 words, 10 marks)

FAQs

1. What does SAT-SAAW stand for?

Satellite Smart Anti Airfield Weapon.

2. What is the value of the new agreement?

₹810.79 crore, commonly rounded to ₹811 crore.

3. Is a glide bomb the same as a conventional unguided bomb?

No. A guided glide bomb combines aerodynamic travel with guidance to improve targeting accuracy.

4. Why does release condition matter?

The aircraft’s altitude and speed at release influence the distance a glide weapon can travel.

5. Does indigenous design necessarily mean every component is domestic?

No. Design origin and the share of domestic content are distinct measures.

U.P. CM Launches Bharat Taxi and Krishak Samriddhi Yojana

Prelims: Bharat Taxi, cooperative sector, Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Gramya Vikas Bank, agricultural credit and social security.
Mains: GS Paper II: Government schemes, welfare measures and cooperative institutions.GS Paper III: Agricultural credit, farmers' welfare, rural development and cooperative sector.
Keywords: Bharat Taxi, Krishak Samriddhi Yojana, Farmers Welfare, Agricultural Credit, Cooperative Bank, Social Security, Zero Commission.

Why in News?

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has launched Bharat Taxi and the Mukhyamantri Krishak Samriddhi Yojana in the state. The two initiatives aim to provide greater social security to taxi and three-wheeler drivers and reduce the financial burden on farmers.

Bharat Taxi

Bharat Taxi is a cooperative-based taxi service aimed at supporting two-wheeler, taxi and three-wheeler drivers.

Under the initiative:

  • Drivers can register with Bharat Taxi and operate under a zero-commission model.
  • Registered drivers will receive social security cover of ₹5 lakh.
  • The service has started in Lucknow, Gorakhpur, Varanasi and Prayagraj.
  • Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) have been signed with institutions including Lucknow Airport, Lucknow Metro and Lucknow Police.

The initiative is intended to provide drivers with better income opportunities and social security while creating an organised transport service.

Mukhyamantri Krishak Samriddhi Yojana

The Mukhyamantri Krishak Samriddhi Yojana has been launched to provide farmers with loans at a lower interest rate through the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Gramya Vikas Bank.

Key Features

  • The interest rate on loans for farmers has been reduced from 11% to 6%.
  • The scheme provides arrangements for long-term loans.
  • The loans are intended to help farmers meet their financial requirements for agriculture and farm machinery.
  • The state government has set a target of extending the benefits of the scheme to 5 lakh small and marginal farmers in the coming years.

Government's Focus on Farmers and Cooperatives

  • Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath highlighted the role of the cooperative sector in supporting farmers. He stated that after the formation of the BJP government in Uttar Pradesh in 2017, loans worth more than ₹36,000 crore were waived for 86 lakh small and marginal farmers, according to the state government's account.
  • He also highlighted the completion of long-pending irrigation projects, including the Saryu Canal National Project.
  • According to the Chief Minister, 16 cooperative banks in the state had become inactive before 2017. Of these, 15 have now returned to profit, while efforts are continuing to improve the remaining bank.
  • Saryu Canal National Project 
  • This Project is a major irrigation project in Uttar Pradesh aimed at providing irrigation facilities to farmers and improving agricultural productivity. 
  • It involves linking several rivers and expanding irrigation coverage in the eastern part of the state.

Significance

  • The two initiatives focus on different sections of the economy. Bharat Taxi seeks to strengthen the livelihood security of drivers, while Mukhyamantri Krishak Samriddhi Yojana aims to improve access to affordable institutional credit for farmers.
  • Lower interest rates can reduce the cost of borrowing for farmers and support investment in agricultural activities and machinery. 
  • Similarly, social security for drivers can provide greater financial protection against economic uncertainties.

Conclusion

Bharat Taxi and Mukhyamantri Krishak Samriddhi Yojana focus on improving livelihood and financial security for two important groups—transport workers and farmers. The initiatives also highlight the role of cooperative institutions in providing economic support and access to formal credit.

Prelims Practice Question 

With reference to the Saryu Canal National Project, consider the following statements:

  1. It is a major irrigation project in Uttar Pradesh. 
  2. It aims to provide irrigation facilities to farmers. 
  3. It is associated with agricultural development in eastern Uttar Pradesh. 

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 only
(b) 1 and 2 only
(c) 1, 2 and 3
(d) 2 and 3 only

Mains Practice Question

Q. “Irrigation infrastructure plays an important role in strengthening agricultural productivity and the rural economy.” Discuss with reference to the Saryu Canal National Project.

FAQs

1. What is the Saryu Canal National Project?

It is a major irrigation project in Uttar Pradesh aimed at expanding irrigation facilities for farmers.

2. What is the main objective of the Saryu Canal Project?

Its main objective is to improve irrigation coverage and support agricultural productivity.

3. Which state is associated with the Saryu Canal National Project?

Uttar Pradesh.

4. Which region benefits particularly from the project?

The project is particularly important for the eastern region of Uttar Pradesh.

5. Why is the project important for UPSC?

It can be studied in the context of irrigation, agriculture, rural development and infrastructure.

India-Germany Submarine Deal: Project 75(I), AIP Technology and Strategic Significance

Prelims: Project 75(I), Air-Independent Propulsion (AIP), Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Limited (MDL), TKMS, Project 75, and defence indigenisation.
Mains: GS II—India–Germany relations; GS III—maritime security, defence technology, indigenous manufacturing and strategic autonomy.

Why in News?

  • Germany has expressed readiness to sign a government-to-government agreement with India for the construction of six conventional submarines under Project 75(I). On 23 September 2026, German Ambassador Jasper Wieck said Germany had completed its documentation and was awaiting completion of India’s internal processes.
  • The proposed partnership involves Germany’s TKMS and India’s Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Limited. The submarines would be built in India with technology transfer.

Background

  • Project 75(I), also written as P-75(I), seeks to strengthen the Indian Navy’s conventional underwater capabilities through domestic construction of six advanced submarines.
  • In June 2021, the Defence Acquisition Council approved issuing the Request for Proposal at an estimated cost of ₹43,000 crore. The Ministry of Defence issued the RFP in July 2021 under the Strategic Partnership Model. That historical estimate should not be confused with current reported valuations.
  • The programme envisages Indian industry working with a foreign technology partner to develop submarine construction capabilities. It is distinct from Project 75, under which six Scorpene-design Kalvari-class submarines were built at MDL with French collaboration.

Key Points

1. Six Conventional Submarines

Project 75(I) envisages six AIP-equipped conventional submarines. Its original requirements include modern sensors, torpedoes, missiles and countermeasure systems, together with training, spares and shore support. These are programme requirements; the final contracted configuration should be confirmed through official announcements.

2. Air-Independent Propulsion

AIP increases the time a conventional submarine can operate underwater without accessing atmospheric air for power generation. Fuel-cell-based AIP is a central requirement of Project 75(I).

Longer submerged endurance can improve operational persistence and reduce exposure associated with frequent snorkelling. AIP does not make a submarine nuclear-powered, and it does not provide unlimited endurance.

3. Indian Manufacturing Partnership

MDL would be the Indian shipbuilding partner, while TKMS would contribute submarine technology and associated expertise. The proposed arrangement centres on construction in India, with technology transfer intended to strengthen domestic capabilities.

4. Technology Transfer

Technology transfer can support local manufacturing, integration, maintenance and workforce training. Its actual value depends on the depth of technical knowledge, documentation and rights provided to the Indian partner.

Domestic construction alone does not automatically establish complete indigenous design capability. The final agreement’s provisions will therefore matter as much as the number of submarines ordered.

5. Approval and Contract Status

Germany’s readiness does not mean that India’s approval process is complete. Reporting indicates that Indian clearances, including the process leading to Cabinet Committee on Security approval, remain relevant before signature. No firm delivery schedule should be inferred from the envoy’s statement.

Significance

The following are potential strategic and industrial implications, subject to successful contracting and implementation:

  • Stronger underwater capability: Additional submarines could improve the Navy’s ability to sustain patrols and maintain operational availability.
  • Greater maritime deterrence: A capable submarine force complicates an adversary’s planning and strengthens India’s options during maritime crises.
  • Industrial development: Construction work could expand demand for specialised engineering, components, testing and skilled labour.
  • Deeper bilateral cooperation: A long-term programme could connect India and Germany through production, training and maintenance partnerships.

Relevance for India

Maritime Security in the Indian Ocean

India’s trade routes, ports and offshore infrastructure make maritime security a major strategic priority. A stronger conventional submarine fleet could support surveillance and help deny hostile forces freedom of operation in contested waters.

Defence Self-Reliance

The programme could support Atmanirbhar Bharat by developing local suppliers and increasing India’s ability to maintain complex naval platforms. Its contribution would be greater if Indian firms acquire meaningful technical competence and reliable access to critical components.

Strategic Autonomy

An additional major industrial partnership could broaden India’s defence options. However, lasting autonomy would depend on domestic repair capability, assured spares and the ability to undertake future upgrades.

Challenges

  • Approval and execution delays: Prolonged negotiations can postpone construction and operational induction.
  • Depth of technology transfer: Assembly experience may not provide access to critical design knowledge or intellectual property.
  • Cost uncertainty: Final prices must account for equipment, infrastructure, training and long-term support.
  • Integration complexity: Propulsion, sensors, weapons and safety systems require extensive testing.
  • Industrial readiness: Shipyard capacity and supplier quality must support demanding submarine standards.
  • Lifecycle dependence: Imported components can create long-term exposure to overseas supply chains.

These are implementation risks to assess, rather than confirmed defects in the proposed agreement.

Way Forward

  1. Define measurable technology-transfer outcomes: Link contractual milestones to training, documentation and demonstrated Indian capability.
  2. Prioritise lifecycle support: Secure access to spares, maintenance expertise and upgrade pathways.
  3. Set realistic schedules: Coordinate shipyard preparation, supplier development and crew training with construction milestones.
  4. Strengthen domestic participation: Enable qualified Indian firms and MSMEs to supply equipment and services.
  5. Sustain indigenous research: Ensure foreign collaboration complements Indian development of underwater technologies.
  6. Communicate verified milestones: Clearly distinguish negotiations, approvals, contract signature, launch and commissioning.

Conclusion

Project 75(I) could strengthen India’s underwater capabilities and deepen defence-industrial cooperation with Germany. Its long-term contribution will depend on timely delivery, effective technology absorption and domestic maintenance capacity. Germany’s readiness is a significant negotiating milestone, while Indian approvals and contract signature remain essential next steps.

Prelims MCQs

Q. Project 75(I) primarily envisages the acquisition of:

(a) Six nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines
(b) Six AIP-equipped conventional submarines
(c) Six aircraft carriers
(d) Six guided-missile destroyers

Mains Practice Question

“The strategic value of defence procurement depends on technology absorption and lifecycle autonomy as much as on platform acquisition.” Discuss with reference to Project 75(I).

FAQs

1. Has the India–Germany submarine agreement been signed?

The reports reviewed for this article describe Germany as ready to sign, with India’s internal processes still pending. They do not establish a completed procurement contract.

2. Will these submarines be nuclear-powered?

No. Project 75(I) concerns conventional submarines equipped with AIP.

3. Where would the submarines be manufactured?

The proposed partnership envisages construction in India through MDL and TKMS.

4. Is Project 75(I) the same as Project 75?

No. Project 75 produced the Kalvari-class submarines based on the French Scorpene design. Project 75(I) is a separate programme for six advanced conventional submarines.

5. What is the final value of the proposed agreement?

The final signed contract value has not been established by the reports cited here. Published estimates vary.

upsc english
« »
  • SUN
  • MON
  • TUE
  • WED
  • THU
  • FRI
  • SAT
Have any Query?

Our support team will be happy to assist you!

OR