New
GS Foundation (P+M) - Delhi : 19th Jan. 2026, 11:30 AM GS Foundation (P+M) - Prayagraj : 09th Jan. 2026, 11:00 AM GS Foundation (P+M) - Delhi : 19th Jan. 2026, 11:30 AM GS Foundation (P+M) - Prayagraj : 09th Jan. 2026, 11:00 AM

Off the guard rails: On the Grok case, explicit imagery

This editorial “Off the guard rails: On the Grok case, explicit imagery”, published in The Hindu on 6th Jan 2026, examines the dangers of unregulated generative AI, highlighting how weak safeguards enable the creation of non-consensual explicit content, raising serious concerns over ethics, accountability, and governance of AI platforms.

Design Philosophy of Grok AI

  • Grok, a generative AI chatbot developed by X (formerly Twitter), avoids the safeguards adopted by firms such as OpenAI and Google.
  • This laissez-faire design has enabled outputs including insults directed at politicians and celebrities.
  • Grok has responded to user requests by non-consensually generating sexually suggestive and explicit images of women.
  • Such requests surged after New Year’s Eve, and the behaviour has continued despite public backlash.

Corporate Response

  • Elon Musk reacted to calls for accountability with jokes, including asking the chatbot to dress him skimpily.
  • This response equates self-directed humour with subjecting strangers to a criminal act.
  • Other corporate entities associated with X also dismissed the seriousness of the issue.

Social Consequences

  • Such content intensifies the hostility faced by women as a gender minority online.
  • Sexual violence and death threats against outspoken women continue with impunity in digital and real spaces.

Accountability Concerns

  • X’s approach appears to rely on the assumption that U.S. geopolitical power will shield it from serious repercussions.
  • While pushing back against the platform, the government must also prosecute those who encourage the creation and circulation of non-consensual intimate imagery.
  • The proliferation of AI tools must not be accompanied by unrestrained misuse of their most harmful capabilities.

Government Stand

  • India and France have demanded the introduction of guardrails.
  • The Union government demanded that X cease such image generation.
  • It explicitly highlighted the criminal nature of generating sexually explicit imagery of women without consent.

Beyond Editorial

Challenges Posed by Artificial Intelligence (AI)

  • Design Challenges: Data bias, opaque algorithms, lack of explainability, weak safety guardrails, and large-scale amplification of harmful outputs (e.g., biased facial recognition systems misidentifying women and minorities).
  • Ethical Challenges: Erosion of consent, misuse of personal data and identities, threats to dignity and autonomy, and unclear moral responsibility for harm (e.g., AI-generated deepfake pornography).
  • Gender-Related Challenges: Disproportionate targeting of women through non-consensual synthetic imagery, online abuse, reinforcement of stereotypes, and hostile digital spaces (e.g., deepfake images of women journalists and politicians).
  • Economic Challenges: Job displacement from automation, widening skill gaps, uneven growth benefits, and market concentration (e.g., AI-driven automation in BPOs and manufacturing).
  • Cross-Jurisdictional Challenges: Borderless AI deployment, conflicts over applicable law, regulatory arbitrage, and enforcement difficulties (e.g., platforms headquartered abroad affecting Indian users).
  • Strategic Challenges: Use of AI in cyberattacks, surveillance, autonomous systems, and information warfare (e.g., AI-enabled cyber intrusions and drone warfare).

India’s Approach to Artificial Intelligence (AI)

  • Global leadership: At GPAI Summit 2023, hosted under India’s chairmanship in New Delhi, India positioned itself as a key voice in global AI governance.
  • People-centric vision: PM Modi emphasised using AI for public welfare, with a special focus on ensuring that countries of the Global South can access and benefit from AI for inclusive development.
  • Trust and safety: India underscored the need for a regulatory framework that ensures AI systems are safe, trusted, and reliable, while promoting international collaboration for long-term and scalable adoption.
  • Regulatory philosophy: Rather than regulating AI at every stage of development, India supports platform-level guidelines, focusing on managing risks such as bias, misuse, and ethical concerns during model training and deployment.

Way Forward to Address Challenges Posed by AI

  • Strengthening Design and Technical Safeguards: Mandate bias audits, explainability standards, and safety guardrails, with continuous testing to prevent harmful outputs (e.g., accuracy audits for facial recognition after documented misidentification of women and minorities).

  • Embedding Ethical Governance: Establish clear norms on consent, data use, and identity protection, with enforceable liability for harm (e.g., criminalisation and takedown obligations for AI-generated deepfake pornography).

  • Gender-Sensitive AI Frameworks: Require safeguards against non-consensual synthetic content, gender bias testing, and fast redress (e.g., platform-level filters and expedited complaint handling for deepfake abuse targeting women journalists).

  • Managing Economic Transitions: Scale reskilling and promote human–AI collaboration while curbing concentration (e.g., national skilling initiatives aligned to automation impacts in BPOs and manufacturing).

  • Addressing Cross-Jurisdictional Gaps: Enhance international cooperation and extraterritorial enforcement (e.g., compliance orders for foreign platforms affecting Indian users).

  • Mitigating Strategic and Security Risks: Adopt national AI security doctrines and regulate high-risk uses (e.g., controls on AI-enabled cyber intrusions and autonomous drone applications).

Have any Query?

Our support team will be happy to assist you!

OR