|
Prelims: (Polity, Science & Technology + CA) |
The Union Government has proposed new guidelines to define “obscenity” and other restricted categories of digital content under the Information Technology Rules, 2021.
The draft seeks to:
These proposals follow a Supreme Court directive seeking a clearer framework balancing Article 19(1)(a) (free speech) with Article 19(2) (reasonable restrictions).
The new guidelines aim to bring greater clarity, uniform standards, and broadcast-level regulation to the digital ecosystem.
For the first time, “obscenity” is explicitly defined within IT Rules using elements from:
This marks a significant expansion resembling broadcast-style content regulation.
A new, detailed “Obscenity” Chapter is proposed.
Digital platforms must avoid content that:
A total of 17 prohibitions have been outlined.
Experts note that the government is importing the Cable TV Programme Code—originally meant for TV broadcasters—into digital regulatory space, raising concerns about overregulation.
OTT platforms may be required to ensure that their content is fit for public exhibition, similar to movies certified under the Cinematograph Act, 1952.
Although officials suggest OTTs are the main target, the draft does not explicitly limit the rule to them.
These provisions (relating to the Code of Ethics) were stayed by the Bombay High Court.
The proposal attempts to revive and expand them, which has raised constitutional concerns.
The Supreme Court’s standard from Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal will be applied.
Under this test, content is not obscene if:
Digital rights groups caution that the broad interpretation could enable arbitrary censorship.
1. Overbroad Definitions
The vague and subjective nature of terms like “good taste” may cover a wide spectrum of legitimate content.
2. Executive Overreach
Critics argue the government is expanding regulatory power through rules instead of Parliamentary law-making.
3. Risk to Free Speech
Ambiguous standards may chill free expression and creative content.
4. Legal Uncertainty
Several IT Rules are sub-judice or stayed by courts, yet similar provisions are being revived.
If the Court approves the guidelines:
For Social Media Platforms
For OTT Streaming Services
For Digital News Publishers
The amendments would move India’s digital regulation closer to a broadcast-style oversight regime, significantly reshaping the online content ecosystem.
|
FAQs 1. What prompted the new obscenity guidelines? A Supreme Court directive in a case involving online objectionable content led to the drafting of detailed regulatory standards. 2. Which platforms will the new rules apply to? Social media networks, OTT streaming services, and digital news platforms. 3. What laws influence the new definition of obscenity? Section 67 of the IT Act, the Cable TV Programme Code, and IPC/Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 4. Will OTT platforms require film-style certification? The proposal suggests alignment with the Cinematograph Act, though officials say this applies primarily to OTTs. 5. What legal test will determine if content is obscene? The Community Standards Test laid down in the Aveek Sarkar judgment. |
Our support team will be happy to assist you!